Now we've all heard about how organic material breaks down into humus. Humus is the not-so-secret component of "Black Gold"... that earthy well composted organic material that binds soil particulates into aggregates, makes gardeners proud and teary eyed to behold, and feeds our precious soil food web. Humus is broken down into two distinct kinds: active humus and stable humus. Many fertilizers contain a mined humate called Leonardite, the result of thousands of years of the decomposition of ancient freshwater marshes. For the longest time, humic acids were thought to be the main carbon constituent of soils. Now, after breakthrough research by Sara Wright in 1996 and further study by her and others, what might be the soil's most important component has been identified.
Most people have now also heard about Mycorrhizal fungi -fungi that extend and improve plant root's abilities to breakdown, make available, transport, and absorb many minerals and nutrients that would not otherwise be available to the plant were it not for this symbiotic relationship. Once the spores germinate, these fungi can only survive about three days before they must become associated with plant roots or they perish. Many organic fertilizers contain inoculants of these amazing organisms and their benefits can be dramatic. They are broken down into two groups: Endomycorrhizae and Ectomycorrhizae. Endomycorrhizae, as the name implies, grow and can produce spores inside the roots of plants and Ectomycorrhizae, which coat the outside of the roots of some plants.
It has also been known that the soil food web is to a large part orchestrated by plants. This is done through plant root exudates, the study of which is still in it's infancy and our understanding is, and may remain, very limited. When you consider the importance of soil bacteria, realize that there are an estimated 60,000 species, most of them having not yet been named, studied, or their role understood, and then think of the growing list of plant root exudates that help orchestrate their behavior, you start to appreciate the intricate web we are delving into. This is a good moment to feel awed at the complexity of an ecology we so often take for granted. Just as it was amazing for us to realize that the overwhelming majority of plant tissue is not derived from the soil, but from the air ( CO2) and water (H2O), it is likewise amazing to realize that a large portion of the hydrocarbons produced by plants through photosynthesis are not held in the plants, but exuded through their roots into the soil food web! The area around the roots where all this action takes place is called the rhizosphere. It's not so surprising then, to think that the endomycorrhizae fungi might likewise also have exudates.
What if I told you that there was a substance in the soil... a substance that was produced by certain fungi in symbiotic relationships with plants... that hold one of the main answers to our planet's health and is able to combat global warming? As Landscapers and Gardeners we're in a position to both appreciate and play a big part in increasing the amount of glomalin in our soils. Amazingly, this material makes up a whopping 27% of soil carbon! Depending on heat and moisture, glomalin can last from seven to twenty-four years. Many soil microbes only last for 20 minutes. fungal hyphae may last from days to weeks. The durability and longevity of glomalin makes it very important for soil health and as a carbon sink. As a glycoprotein, carbon is stored in both it's sugar component and it's protein component, making it 30-40% carbon, up to 24 times as heavy as humic acids, and soils can contain four times as much glomalin as humates! It provides more nitrogen and carbon to the soil than do hyphae or other soil microbes and can be found in quantities of over 100 mg/g in some soils. It's durability is also the reason it took so long to identify it. To find glomalin, you must put a soil sample in a bath of citrate and then heat it at 250 F for an hour!
Glomalin is named after the order of fungi that produce it: Glomales. This Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi creates glomalin in order to give rigidity and strength to it's hyphae so as to better bridge gaps between soil particles and to help transport soil solutions. As the older hyphae outlive their short lifespan, and new hyphae are produced near the root tips, they release the glomalin in the soil. It's interesting to note that tilling soil greatly reduces the amount of glomalin in soils. Also interesting is that higher concentrations of CO2 in the air promotes rapid glomalin production. This may be one of the major (and overlooked!) feedback loops the Earth has to regulate CO2 content in our atmosphere -and yet another reason to be awed and amazed by the abilities of plants! Between a 3 year study on shrubs and a 6 year study on grasses in San Diego, Wright and scientists from Riverside and Stanford showed that when CO2 levels reached 670ppm (the level we will attain by 2050 given current trends), Glomales hyphae grew three times as long and glomalin production increased 500%. Wright says that the same increase can come from good soil management techniques. Longer hyphae can help plants reach and absorb more water, protect soil from erosion, and increase the fertility of soils. These are all important traits for plants to survive in a warming climate.
Why is this not headline news?! Here we have a major component of healthy top soil- the precious material that we all depend on for our survival, perhaps a key feedback loop in regulating our planet's CO2 levels, and an element of soil fertility that may prove more important to our future in the long run than the Haber process of fixing ammonium nitrate. This discovery is fifteen years old and yet when I ask my fellow gardeners and landscapers if they've heard of glomalin, I get raised eye brows and an inquisitive look... This has to change. This knowledge is precious. Hats off to Sarah and her team! I hope you all go out and include glomalin in your discussions regarding soil fertility and carbon sequestration.
(photo by Sara Wright)
One reason why Glomalin is not discussed in the gardening community can be found by looking at the extensive length of your most appreciated posting and by examining the scientific tone of the information provided.
Your blog has not made it easy to disseminate the information because it is too scholarly for the average gardener. Like many gardeners and garden writers, I do not have a science background. The only fact that I am able to glean from the information is that tilling soil is not a good thing. Did I get that right?
Gardeners need to know
1] how can we ensure that our soil has Glomalin in it.
2] How can we add Glomalin to our soil?
3] Is it compatible with compost?
4] Is it compatible with granular fertilizer?
5] What are hyphae and why do we need to know about them?
6] Will the presence of Glomalin in our soil guarantee that our plants will grow healthier, longer, or bigger?
Another reason why we may not have heard more about Glomalin may be that the findings are not supported by the research of others. Is that a possibility and have "The Garden Professors" weighed in on this subject?
If what you have reported has been corroborated by others, then the questions I listed above will reflect the level of dialogue necessary to effectively disseminate the information. But first, it will require translation into an English that is "spreadable".
Thank you so much for bringing this topic to our attention. Where do we go from here?
Posted by: allanbecker-gardenguru | 01/15/2011 at 01:59 PM
Hi GardenGuru,
Thanks for your comments.
I'll address some of your questions here, but will save some for future blogs. I'll try to tone down the science in future blogs.
Firstly, in terms of corroboration of others and "the garden professors", the source for most of the information presented came from the ARS, the United States Department of Agriculture's Agricultural Research Service. If you don't trust them, try wikipedia. Otherwise there is a fantastic list of references and research at:
http://www.ars.usda.gov/SP2UserFiles/ad_hoc/54450000Glomalin/References.pdf
There is also a simple description with diagrams to describe what glomalin and hyphae are here:
http://www.ars.usda.gov/SP2UserFiles/ad_hoc/54450000Glomalin/Glomalinbrochure.pdf
The basic answers to your questions are:
Maintain plants that support endomycorrhizae fungi and don't over till or allow soil to go fallow. Use cover crops. Soils poor in soil biology can be inoculated by the use of high quality compost, compost tea, compost extract, or direct application of Mycorrhizae fungi. This will only work if the fungi come into contact with plant roots. Synthetic fertilizers high in urea are salty and do not promote the soil food web, of which Mycorrhizal fungi are a part. Hyphae are to fungi what roots are to plants. Yes, a soil high in glomalin will necessarily be high in organic matter, humates, and have an active and thriving soil biology -all of which will promote good plant health and pathogenic suppression. Other good indicators are high populations of earth worms and microarthropods. Bigger is not necessarily better when it comes to plant tissue. Plants that grow too big too fast generally get diseases and pests.
Compost, Mulch, avoiding synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, and nurturing the soil biology -feeding it with organic matter and not tilling up the soil fungus and worms; these are all good land stewardship practices that will help us increase carbon sequestration in soils.
Posted by: Dave Phelps, ASLA | 01/17/2011 at 10:15 PM
Thank you for the comprehensive answer. It is most appreciated.
I plant mostly perennials and ornamental shrubs and have been cutting back on chemical fertilizers by using more compost. However, I would be most interested in finding out which perennials, if any, will stimulate Glomalin in the soil, the way that some crops do. Will look for my reply in your future postings.
Posted by: allanbecker-gardenguru | 01/18/2011 at 11:18 AM
This is fascinating! Thanks for telling me about glomalin; it is very relevent to biochar.
--Alex, The Biochar Guy
Posted by: Alex Brendel | 02/15/2011 at 11:16 PM
Hello Dave,
Your explanation is succinct and much better than ARS's own Press Office description.
You do not need to 'tone down' the science. We are not all country bumpkins even in the UK.
It makes a pleasant change to read about science put across by someone who understands what he is talking about instead of a purveyor of muck and magic.
It is also a pleasant change to learn that a woman is getting the credit for isolating and naming Glomalin.
Peter Revell, Hemel Hempstead, UK
Posted by: Peter Revell | 03/24/2011 at 12:14 PM
Very informative post. A bit lengthy for me and well a bit too sciency. Although I suppose you tried to put it across as simply as possible.
So maybe the reason why not a lot of gardeners and landscapers have heard about it is because the name Glomalin sounds like a cough medicine instead of something that's good for the soil. Just a thought. Peace!
Posted by: Katy Landscaper | 04/19/2011 at 12:45 AM
Why they don't discuss about that? Because the news are more interested on political issues, killing terrorists or life stars, the planet health is somewhere on the last place and saving the planet doesn't bring so much money.
Posted by: Miami eye doctors | 05/09/2011 at 02:34 AM